Model data

Climate & ETo

Climate data provide the atmospheric forcing required for crop-water analysis and watershed simulation. The HARE reconstruction retains the historical FAO climate reference used for CROPWAT analysis while also comparing it with the more recent climate representation used in SWAT.

Important. Climate datasets from different periods and sources should not be expected to reproduce identical rainfall totals. Their role is to provide documented climatic inputs appropriate to each model and to allow transparent comparison of rainfall and evaporative demand.
FAO climate reference
1961–1990

Historical climate normal used as the reference climate dataset for the CROPWAT reconstruction.

Reference location
6.03°N, 37.56°E

Approximate Arba Minch / Hare reference location, elevation about 1239 m.

Annual rainfall
811 mm

Long-term FAO historical annual rainfall total.

Annual reference ETo
1622 mm

Annual reference evapotranspiration from the FAO climate dataset.

Historical climate

Monthly FAO Climate Data

The following monthly climate values are used as the historical climate reference for the modern CROPWAT assessment.

Month Rainfall
mm
Wet days Tmin
°C
Tmax
°C
Tmean
°C
RH
%
Sunshine
%
Wind
m/s
ETo
mm/month
ETo
mm/day
January 24 2.7 13.8 31.0 22.4 41.5 80.2 1.2 145 4.7
February 22 3.6 15.0 31.6 23.3 41.6 80.7 1.2 142 5.1
March 70 5.5 16.0 31.4 23.7 47.8 73.2 1.6 168 5.4
April 135 11.3 16.5 29.9 23.2 59.4 63.9 1.3 141 4.7
May 128 9.9 16.7 28.3 22.5 66.0 64.4 1.3 135 4.4
June 53 8.6 16.4 27.4 21.9 64.7 59.9 1.3 123 4.1
July 42 7.8 16.2 26.4 21.3 65.6 51.6 1.3 119 3.8
August 46 8.4 16.2 26.9 21.5 65.1 56.9 1.3 127 4.1
September 94 7.4 16.1 28.1 22.1 62.1 64.5 1.2 132 4.4
October 116 6.8 15.6 28.6 22.1 64.4 64.7 1.2 132 4.3
November 60 5.7 14.0 29.3 21.6 58.5 72.4 1.0 125 4.2
December 21 3.4 13.0 30.1 21.5 49.7 82.3 1.0 133 4.3
Annual / mean 811 81.1 — — — — — — 1622 —
Modern watershed check

FAO Climate vs SWAT

The SWAT simulation provides a useful independent comparison of precipitation and atmospheric evaporative demand. The comparison must be interpreted carefully because the two datasets represent different periods and modelling procedures.

Parameter FAO historic climate SWAT simulation Interpretation
Climate period 1961–1990 Modern SWAT simulation period Periods differ and therefore direct rainfall equality is not expected.
Annual precipitation 811 mm 1665.5 mm Difference may reflect period, climate source, spatial averaging and model representation.
Reference ETo / PET 1622 mm 1570.7 mm Annual values are relatively close, differing by about 3.2%. They are useful as a consistency check but are not automatically the same physical model variable.
Actual ET — 928.9 mm SWAT actual ET represents simulated water actually lost through evaporation and plant transpiration.
Interpretation. The similarity between annual FAO reference ETo and SWAT PET provides a useful broad-scale check of atmospheric evaporative demand. However, the final HARE documentation should record the PET method selected in SWAT before making a detailed method-to-method comparison.
Model use

How Climate Data Feed the Models

HEC-HMS

Design Rainfall

HEC-HMS primarily uses rainfall-event data developed from daily rainfall, frequency analysis and design-storm construction. Monthly climate averages are not the principal event input.

SWAT

Continuous Climate

SWAT uses continuous weather series to simulate rainfall, evapotranspiration, runoff, soil water, groundwater and streamflow over long simulation periods.

CROPWAT

Reference ETo

CROPWAT uses monthly climate variables to calculate or define reference evapotranspiration, which is combined with crop coefficients to determine crop evapotranspiration and irrigation demand.

Data status

Climate Data Status

Dataset Use Status
FAO historical monthly climate CROPWAT reference climate and historical comparison. Available
FAO monthly reference ETo CROPWAT crop-water calculations. Available
SWAT daily climate Continuous watershed simulation. Available
SWAT PET method documentation Required for final ETo/PET comparison. Document method