HEC-HMS · Technical workspace

Simulation Runs

The Hare HEC-HMS model was prepared as an event-based design-flood model. Each simulation uses the same basin geometry, hydrologic parameters, routing configuration and computational time step. Only the adopted 24-hour design rainfall depth changes with return period.

Model consistency: All design runs use the 162.035 km² Hare watershed, five subbasins, SCS Curve Number losses, SCS Unit Hydrograph transformation, Muskingum routing, no baseflow, a 15-minute computation interval and a 72-hour simulation window.

1. Design Simulation Register

The table below provides the working register for the principal design-storm simulations. It distinguishes between completed runs and events that have been configured but still require final simulation and result extraction.

Run ID Return Period 24-h Rainfall Outlet Status
RUN_HARE_10YR 10 years 49.61 mm Sink-1 / Hare Weir Configured / not yet finalised
RUN_HARE_25YR 25 years 54.99 mm Sink-1 / Hare Weir Configured / result to be confirmed
RUN_HARE_50YR 50 years 58.98 mm Sink-1 / Hare Weir Completed and accepted
RUN_HARE_100YR 100 years 62.95 mm Sink-1 / Hare Weir Configured / not yet finalised

2. Adopted Design Rainfall

The final HEC-HMS event simulations use the adopted 24-hour design rainfall depths obtained from the frequency analysis prepared for the Hare watershed.

Return Period Adopted 24-h Rainfall HEC-HMS Event
10-year 49.61 mm P24,T=10
25-year 54.99 mm P24,T=25
50-year 58.98 mm P24,T=50
100-year 62.95 mm P24,T=100
Important: These values supersede earlier preliminary rainfall depths tested during model development. Only the final adopted design rainfall series should be used for the website, book and final design comparisons.

3. Common Model Configuration

To permit direct comparison among return periods, the basin model and hydrologic parameters are kept unchanged between runs. The design rainfall depth is the principal input that varies.

Watershed

162.035 km²

Five subbasins, S_1 to S_5, draining toward the Hare Weir.

Loss Method

SCS Curve Number

Weighted Curve Numbers assigned individually to each subbasin.

Transform

SCS Unit Hydrograph

Final adopted lags of 118, 76, 65, 52 and 62 minutes for S_1 to S_5.

Baseflow

None

Event simulations represent direct storm runoff.

Routing

Muskingum

R_1 and R_2 route the flood hydrograph toward the project outlet.

Computation Interval

15 minutes

The same time step is maintained for all design simulations.

Storm Duration

24 hours

Synthetic design rainfall is applied over one day.

Simulation Duration

72 hours

Allows the complete flood hydrograph and recession to pass through the watershed.

4. Accepted 50-Year Design Run

The 50-year event was used as the principal completed design simulation during the current stage of the Hare headworks reassessment.

Run Name

RUN_HARE_50YR

Design Rainfall

58.98 mm / 24 h

Outlet Peak Discharge

114.4 m³/s

Runoff Depth

16.84 mm

Approximate Runoff Volume

2.73 million m³

Peak Time

Simulation Day 1 · approximately 16:15

The peak discharge of 114.4 m³/s is reported at Sink-1, the HEC-HMS element representing the Hare Weir and irrigation headworks outlet.

At the time of peak discharge, the routed flow from reach R_2 contributes approximately 111.1 m³/s, while the local contribution from S_4 is approximately 3.2 m³/s. Their combination produces the reported outlet peak.

Interpretation: The 50-year result is the accepted balanced design-event result currently retained for the Hare headworks analysis.

5. 25-Year Design Run

The 25-year event is configured using the same basin model, loss method, transform parameters, routing parameters, computation interval and simulation duration as the accepted 50-year run.

Run Name

RUN_HARE_25YR

Design Rainfall

54.99 mm / 24 h

Outlet

Sink-1 / Hare Weir

Status

Configured — final outlet result to be confirmed

Once the final 25-year simulation output is confirmed, the outlet peak discharge, runoff depth, runoff volume and peak time should be inserted here so that the 25-year and 50-year hydrographs can be compared directly.

6. Reproducibility Checklist

Each simulation should be reproducible from the stored HEC-HMS project by maintaining the following settings.

Item Adopted Setting
Basin model Final Hare basin model
Total area 162.035 km²
Subbasins S_1, S_2, S_3, S_4, S_5
Loss method SCS Curve Number
Transform method SCS Unit Hydrograph
Baseflow None
Routing method Muskingum
Computation interval 15 minutes
Storm duration 24 hours
Simulation period 72 hours
Design outlet Sink-1 / Hare Weir

7. Preliminary and Superseded Runs

A number of preliminary simulations were carried out while the basin lag times, design rainfall and routing representation were being reviewed. Those simulations were useful during model development but should not be treated as final design results.

Design record: Earlier high-flow test results and simulations based on preliminary rainfall depths have been superseded by the final adopted rainfall series and balanced basin configuration documented on this website.

8. Design Run Comparison

Return Period P24 (mm) Peak at Hare Weir Runoff Depth Status
10 years 49.61 — — Not yet finalised
25 years 54.99 — — Result to be confirmed
50 years 58.98 114.4 m³/s 16.84 mm Completed / accepted
100 years 62.95 — — Not yet finalised

9. Role of the Simulation Runs

The HEC-HMS design runs provide the flood hydrographs required for the hydraulic assessment of the Hare diversion structure. The outlet hydrograph provides more information than a single peak-flow value, because it also describes the timing, duration and total volume of the flood event.

The final HEC-HMS design results will subsequently be compared with independent SWAT watershed modelling. This provides an additional check on the hydrologic basis adopted for the reconstructed Hare Irrigation Project.