Original GIS classes
Water, trees and orchards, cropland, built-up areas, shrubs, bare ground and other mapped classes remain unchanged in the project archive.
The HARE land-use and soil datasets are preserved first as GIS evidence, then translated into the parameter classes required by HEC-HMS, SWAT and CROPWAT. The objective is to avoid changing the original mapped classes merely to suit one model.
Water, trees and orchards, cropland, built-up areas, shrubs, bare ground and other mapped classes remain unchanged in the project archive.
Each model receives only the classifications it requires. A lookup table documents how the GIS classes are converted into hydrologic parameters, HRU classes or crop/soil inputs.
Modern land-cover mapping for the Hare command area distinguishes agricultural and non-agricultural land while retaining classes that are important for irrigation planning and watershed modelling.
| GIS class | Interpretation in Hare study | HEC-HMS use | SWAT use | CROPWAT relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water | River, ponds or permanent water surfaces. | Very low infiltration-loss area; generally not treated as normal land surface. | Water land-use class / open-water HRU where applicable. | Excluded from irrigable crop area. |
| Trees / orchards | Includes tree crops, orchards and banana where identified. | Contributes to curve-number and infiltration parameter selection. | Converted to appropriate forest/orchard/plantation HRU class. | Tree crops such as banana or orchard can be included as irrigated crops. |
| Cropland | Existing agricultural fields and cultivable command-area land. | Agricultural land-cover condition used in loss estimation. | Agricultural HRU class according to crop/land-use assignment. | Main source of crop areas and cropping-pattern allocation. |
| Built-up | Settlement, roads and developed areas. | Higher runoff potential than agricultural land. | Urban/built-up HRU class. | Excluded from irrigable crop area. |
| Shrubs / rangeland | Non-cropped shrub or grazing areas. | Assigned runoff parameters based on hydrologic condition. | Shrub/rangeland HRU class. | Normally excluded unless converted to future irrigable land. |
| Bare ground | Exposed land, disturbed ground or non-vegetated surfaces. | Generally high runoff potential. | Bare-ground HRU class. | Excluded from crop area unless specifically reclaimed. |
The Hare watershed soil mapping indicates a relatively simple soil pattern dominated by loam-type soils, with differences in texture and hydrologic response. The same soil evidence is interpreted differently by each model.
Soil information is used principally for rainfall-loss estimation, especially when the SCS Curve Number method is applied.
In the current reconstruction, the upland watershed is represented predominantly by Hydrologic Soil Group C, while the lower command area has been treated as more slowly infiltrating Group D where appropriate.
SWAT uses soil together with land use and slope to define Hydrologic Response Units. Soil parameters influence infiltration, percolation, available water, runoff and groundwater recharge.
The original mapped soil units should remain traceable through the SWAT reclassification table.
CROPWAT uses soil properties to estimate total available soil moisture, maximum infiltration, maximum rooting depth and initial soil-water depletion.
These values influence irrigation scheduling and the amount of water that can be stored in the crop root zone between irrigation events.
| Original evidence | HEC-HMS translation | SWAT translation | CROPWAT translation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land-cover class | Used with soil group to select runoff/loss parameters. | Converted into SWAT land-use codes for HRU creation. | Used to identify crop area versus non-irrigable area. |
| Soil texture / unit | Hydrologic Soil Group and Curve Number support. | Soil profile properties for infiltration and storage. | Available water and root-zone storage. |
| Slope | Supports basin response and flow-path interpretation. | Used directly in HRU slope classes. | Not a principal CROPWAT input, but relevant to field irrigation suitability. |
| Command-area boundary | Not the primary catchment boundary. | Can be analysed as a sub-area within the watershed. | Defines the area over which crop demand is aggregated. |
| Dataset | Current use | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Modern land-use raster | Command-area reconstruction and SWAT HRU preparation. | Available |
| SWAT land-use reclassification | HRU definition. | Completed |
| Soil mapping | HEC-HMS, SWAT and CROPWAT interpretation. | Available |
| Hydrologic soil groups | Curve Number and runoff-loss estimation. | Review / document |
| CROPWAT soil parameters | Irrigation scheduling and root-zone storage. | To be finalized |